Day #11: Three Requests, Still No Study
Day #11: Three Requests, Still No Study
Today I sent my third request for the Home Insurance Insights study referenced by Nextdoor.
Here’s the timeline:
June 15: Initial request for the full study.
June 22: Follow-up request.
Today: Third request.
As of today, it’s been 11 days since my original email.
The result?
No acknowledgment.
No explanation.
This isn’t about whether I agree or disagree with the findings.
It’s about transparency.
If a company publicly references research, it seems reasonable to expect that someone requesting the underlying methodology, demographics, and supporting information would at least receive a response.
Instead, the silence has become the story.
It also raises a broader question.
If this is how an investor is treated when requesting information referenced in a public article, what should users, local businesses, advertisers, or other shareholders expect when they have a question that needs attention?
Leadership sets expectations.
Culture determines whether those expectations are met.
At some point, a simple reply becomes less about one email and more about how an organization values communication and accountability.
If the study arrives tomorrow, I’ll gladly share that update too.
Join the discussion on NielFlamm.com.
Does Dynamic Pricing Build Community or Divide It?
I recently read Nextdoor's latest travel insights report, "Who Are Nextdoor's Summer Travelers? New Data Shows a High-Value, High-Intent Audience," which highlights that neighbors plan to spend significantly more on travel this summer and offers guidance on how advertisers can capitalize on these spending patterns.
I encourage everyone to review the full report and draw their own conclusions.
One section gave me pause.
In a previous post, I questioned whether moderators or platform personnel have access to verified address information. If any individual with inappropriate intent had access to that information and could also infer travel plans, it raises obvious privacy and security questions that deserve discussion. Strong governance and safeguards are essential for any community platform.
I also noticed the report is based on an internal Nextdoor survey conducted in April 2026. Yet, many of the detailed survey methodologies and statistical metrics are not publicly provided alongside the findings. Greater transparency around methodology can help readers better evaluate research conclusions.
Finally, the report discusses opportunities for advertisers to target neighbors based on spending behaviors and travel intent. Dynamic pricing models have become common across industries—from airlines to rideshare services and technology products—but I question whether encouraging businesses to maximize pricing based on demand truly strengthens neighborhood relationships or creates additional financial pressure for families trying to enjoy time together.
Community platforms should strive to connect neighbors, not simply optimize monetization opportunities.
Read the complete report and decide for yourself.
Subscribe to NielFlamm.com.