๐๐ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ข๐ป ๐ ๐ฒ ๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐โ๐บ ๐๐ผ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ก๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฑ๐ผ๐ผ๐ฟ
I think I finally figured it out.
By publicly criticizing, analyzing, parodying, and discussing Nextdoor so oftenโฆ Iโm helping drive attention directly to the platform.
Because Nextdoor doesnโt always feel like a calm digital neighborhood square.
Sometimes it feels like daytime chaos television.
A little The Jerry Springer Show, mixed with The Steve Wilkos Show security energy, and a dash of Maury โthe DNA results determinedโฆโ drama โ except instead of paternity tests, itโs HOA complaints, parking wars, surveillance screenshots, suspicious vans, missing pets, fireworks at midnight, and neighbors arguing over garbage cans.
And historically, chaotic talk shows worked for one reason:
People watched.
People shared.
People talked about the chaos afterward.
That attention became the product.
The irony is hard to ignore:
The more people debate moderation, censorship, neighborhood drama, and strange platform behaviorโฆ the more engagement the platform receives.
Even investors may be noticing.
The stock has shown signs of life recently, and whether people love the platform, hate it, mock it, or criticize it โ attention still fuels visibility.
That doesnโt erase legitimate concerns surrounding moderation transparency, unpaid moderators, vague rule enforcement, or appeals systems.
But it does reveal something uncomfortable about modern social media:
Outrage has economic value.
Drama has engagement value.
And maybe Nextdoor accidentally became less of a neighborhood app and more of a reality show with property lines.
Which meansโฆ I may have joined the marketing department by mistake.
Youโre welcome Nirav Tolia.